naked law

I do not overrule decisions of a judge of this Court. The judicial pecking order does not permit little peckers to overrule big peckers. It is the other way around.

 

South Side Woodwork (1979) Ltd. v. R.C. Contracting Ltd. (1989) 95 A.R. 161.



For example, a newspaper publishes the true fact that a well-known public figure was born illegitimate. The bastard may be mentally aggrieved by the dissemination of that information. However, he has no cause of action.


 

Turton v. Butler and Toronto Sun (1987) 85 A.R. 193 at 195.



If it looks very much like a duck, walks very much like a duck and quacks very much like a duck there is a high probability it may well be a duck.

 

General Motors Acceptance Corp. of Canada, Ltd. v. Trans Canada Credit Corp. [1994] A.J.



The Court notes that this case involves two extremely likable lawyers, who have together delivered some of the most amateurish pleadings ever to cross the hallowed causeway into Galveston, an effort which leads the Court to surmise but one plausible explanation. Both attorneys have obviously entered into a secret pact complete with hats, handshakes and cryptic words to draft their pleadings entirely in crayon on the back sides of gravy-stained paper place mats, in the hope that the Court would be so charmed by their child-like efforts that their utter dearth of legal authorities in their briefing would go unnoticed. Whatever actually occurred, the Court is now faced with the daunting task of deciphering their submissions. With Big Chief tablet readied, thick black pencil in hand, and a devil-may-care laugh in the face of death, life on the razor's edge sense of exhilaration, the Court begins.

 

Bradshaw v. Unity Marine Corporation, Inc. G-00-558, 2001 WL 739951



Consult Us - The Legal Advantage